Monk, Jessica E. and Belson, Sue and Colditz, Ian G. and Lee, Caroline (2018) Attention Bias Test Differentiates Anxiety and Depression in Sheep. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 12. ISSN 1662-5153
pubmed-zip/versions/1/package-entries/fnbeh-12-00246/fnbeh-12-00246.pdf - Published Version
Download (1MB)
Abstract
Negative affective states such as anxiety and depression pose a risk to animal welfare, however, practical tests for assessing these states in animals are limited. In humans, anxious individuals are shown to pay more attention toward threatening information than non-anxious individuals, known as an attention bias. Previously, an attention bias test was developed and validated as a measure of anxious states in sheep, where more anxious sheep showed increased attention toward a threat (dog) and were more vigilant than Control animals. Studies in humans suggest that attention biases also occur in depressed individuals, with observations of attention biases toward threats, as well as biases away from positive stimuli. Given these findings, we hypothesized that an attention bias test for sheep could also be used to assess states of depression. We predicted that Merino ewes in pharmacologically induced Depressed (para-chlorophenylalanine) and Anxious (m-chlorophenylpiperazine) states would show greater attention toward a threat than Control animals (saline), but that the Depressed sheep would show relatively less interest in a positive stimulus (photograph of a conspecific). During testing, Depressed sheep paid more attention toward the threat and less toward the photograph than Control animals as predicted (Analyses of Variance, P < 0.05, n = 16 per treatment). Interestingly, Anxious sheep showed an attention bias in the opposite direction, paying more attention toward the photograph and less toward the threat than Control animals (P < 0.05). Both Anxious and Depressed sheep were more vigilant than Control animals (P = 0.002). These results suggest the attention bias test can be used to measure and differentiate states of depression and anxiety in livestock. The bidirectional nature of the attention bias identified between treatments highlights the importance of measuring multiple behaviors in the test and considering the context in which the test is applied. This will enable a clearer characterization of the affective state of an animal, as an aspect of its welfare.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Subjects: | STM Digital Library > Medical Science |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email support@stmdigitallib.com |
Date Deposited: | 10 Feb 2023 09:54 |
Last Modified: | 21 May 2024 12:13 |
URI: | http://archive.scholarstm.com/id/eprint/387 |